How to Avoid Ineffective Communication (Part Two)
2023-03-22
This article mainly discusses a recent representative case of ineffective communication.
Personal information and sensitive information have been omitted in this article. The text has been slightly adjusted for the sake of explaining the issue.
0. Related Articles
How to Avoid Ineffective Communication (Part One)
1. Event Details
One day, colleague A posted a question on the company's Q&A system with the following content:
Text Only | |
---|---|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
|
Colleague B, who received the question, had no idea what it was trying to express and felt his time was wasted. This led to the following conversation:
2. Commentary
"Raising a question" must first ensure that a "question has indeed been raised."
In this case, colleague A simply took a few screenshots without actually "raising a question." It was inevitable that colleague B couldn’t understand it.
When we ask questions, we should assume the other party knows nothing about the entire situation, and necessary background information must be clearly explained, such as:
- What am I doing?
- What materials are being provided (screenshots, logs, etc.)?
- What effect do I expect or anticipate?
- What actually happened?
A typical example of a confusing question looks like this:
The correct and complete way to ask a question should look like this:
{
"data": {
"name": "Developers and testers use together"
}
}
Everyone should avoid laziness when communicating at work, especially when asking questions, and should not ask incomplete questions.
Although it may save a few minutes when asking the question, if the responder doesn’t understand the problem, they will still need to repeatedly confirm, which ultimately does not save time and instead wastes both parties' time, making it counterproductive.
I hope everyone can gain something from this article!